
The explanation to the diagram given above is that, the behavioural component of attitude deals with the overt behavior a learner exhibits due to the influence of the cognitive and affective components. The most widely held view of the structure of an attitude is that, it is made up of three (3) closely interrelated component namely:-Cognitive (awareness, comprehension), Affective (liking and evaluation) and Conative (action and tendency). Measurement of attitude or respondents’ action to a subject matter is usually focused on the middle component, assessing the degree of positive and negative feeling for something, (Paula 1987). It is theoretical possible to derive a measure of attitude from any one of the three domain. Attitude can be measured directly by asking a respondent to indicate whether he or she likes or dislikes an object on positive- negative scales. The indirect approaches rely on deriving a measure from another individual response, the mean of individual score is taken as their measurement (Meyer 1990). The simplest way to measure overall attitude toward an object or individual is to ask a respondent whether he like or dislike it. There are no explicit attitude criteria given on which evaluation is made. Respondent must give a direct answer of Yes or No and the response is used to determine the object or person.
The success of any initiatives to implement technology in an educational program depends strongly upon the support and attitudes of teachers involved. It has been suggested that if teachers believed or perceived proposed computer programs as fulfilling neither their own or their students' needs, they are not likely to attempt to introduce technology into their teaching and learning. Among the factors that affect the successful use of computers in the classroom are teachers' attitudes towards computers (Huang &Liaw, 2005). Attitude, in turn, constitutes various dimensions.