
Superscripts a and b show that the values are significantly different while all the values bearing the same letter shows no significant different statistically. The bacteria count of Pito for Share was 7.67 ± 3.79, Ojaoba was 7.33 ± 4.05, Owode was 4.33 ± 2.89, Omu-Aran was 5.67 ± 2.89and Ipata was 5.33 ± 0.58respectively. When the bacteria count of the five locations were compared with respect to Pito, there were no significant different (p>0.05). With respect to Soy milk, the Ojaoba (6.00 ± 2.00) and Owode (6.33 ± 2.08) were significantly different from Share (3.33 ± 0.58), Omu-Aran (5.00 ± 1.00) and Ipata (2.67 ± 0.57) but Ojaoba and owode were not different from each other. Also, the bacteria count of Kunu for Ojaoba was 13.33 ± 7.64, which was significantly higher than that of Share (4.33 ± 2.08), Owode (4.67 ± 1.53), Omu-Aran (4.33 ± 0.58) and Ipata (5.33 ± 3.21) respectively. With respect to Zobo, no significant difference was found between and within the five locations examined (p>0.05).