• A Critique Of Wiredu’s Concept Of Truth

  • CHAPTER ONE -- [Total Page(s) 7]

    Page 7 of 7

    Previous   3 4 5 6 7
    • That which guides truly is true…
      “the hypothesis that works is the true one and  truth is an abstract applied to the  collection of cases, actual, foreseen, and desired, that receive confirmation in their consequencys”.31
      Consequences fore the pragmatists, then go into the very essence of meaning and truth.
                In this “Essay in experimental logic”, Dewey suggests, that the term pragmatic only mean the rule of all thinking all reflective consideration to “Consequences:” for final meaning and text.
                In brief formulation the pragmatist approach to truth can be stated thus: A thought is true, not because it agrees with some experimental reality as most traditionalists hold, but because it works all right. That is, it has valid consequences it is applied to some specific situations. It is false not because it misrepresents reality, bust because when it is used it fails to work out right. Truth, then consist in the usefulness of an idea in practice. And a preposition is verified or falsified by proving usable or non-usable in action.
                By way of general critique of pragmatism it is true, as Bernard Russell   and Arthur Lukejor, among others, point out that the notion of truth as what work is unclear since the concept of “Workability” is ambiguous. A brief cans work in two different senses at the same time. Also in stating that the only common characteristics of all our true beliefs are that they “pay”. Williams seems to suggest that the consequences   of  entertaining such belief are better than those of rejecting them.
                But also Russell point out, it is enormously difficult to know a priori the consequences of holding any belief. How are we to determine, for instance weather the effects of believing in Islamic religion are on the whole good or bad?
                Also common to all pragmatic is the view that nothing  should be considered true, except that which is experienciable and emperically verifiable. However, it is  also true that to say, for instance that S is P becomes true does not mean that S is P become  verified. It can only mean that S become P.
  • CHAPTER ONE -- [Total Page(s) 7]

    Page 7 of 7

    Previous   3 4 5 6 7