Hypothesis two was rejected and revealed that there was significant relationship between government attitude towards teaching and learning of English Language in Primary School. This conforms to Bazauye (1992) who stated that government policy, teachers’ possessiveness to the condition of language, environment factors and students’ attitude to work. Pollards and Triggs (1997) stated the factors affect the teaching and learning of English Language: classroom environment relationship, lack of dedication of teachers, overcrowding in schools and linguistic interference.
The finding of hypothesis three was rejected and revealed there was significant relationship between availability of instructional materials towards teaching and learning of English Language in Primary School. Abiri (1980) affirmed that instructional materials or teaching aids make learning meaningful by relating language to more concrete objects and situati through the use of visual or audio visual aids He said further that they are of various types and are of tremendous importance in the teaching of language at any level Instructional materials help to arouse students’ interest, motivate and make learning easier for them.
The result of hypothesis four was rejected and indicated that there was significant relationship between methodology of teaching towards teaching and learning of English Language in Primary School. Oyenuga (2007) found that the poor teaching and learning in secondary schools to inadequate materials and infrastructural resources which are below expectation with some schools having few classrooms accommodation without windows, poor spacing and crowded seats. William (1990) stated that lack of concentration arises in most cases where the teacher uses words above the level of the students, and where he talks to the board rather than to the students.